|
TRUTH or DARE
GILESWOODFORDE enjoys the City of Oxford Theatre Guild's production of Truth or Dare D o you like going to old school and college reunions? Or do you avoid them like the plague? Either way, Mike Coleman's play Truth or Dare will certainly focus your mind on the subject. The plot follows three couples in their fifties, who meet up again for the first time since they left university 30 years before. As students, they were practicably inseparable. The reunion is to be a themed event: everyone is required to dress as' they did at university, and appropriate student food is served - spag bog, of course, with the spaghetti dyed bright blue.When that dish appeared on the table, several members of the first-night audience laughed loudly in recognition. They continued to laugh, but sometimes more uneasily, as events unfolded. For the long, embarrassing pauses (well observed by director Aldyth Thompson) that punctuate early exchanges between the three couples soon give way to downright rows, and revelations about who slept with who in those far off days. "The self-fulfilment, it's all coming back," announces rather mousy-seeming Ruth. . So far, so predictable. But what about Maggie, the crisply bossy lady who is running the reunion? Why do her expressions range from the faintly amused, to the supercilious, to the downright hostile? Suffice it to say that Truth or Dare moves from well-worn early Ayckbourn territory into something much more sinister
Looking back The cast of this Oxford Theatre Guild production all deliver convincing performances, although on opening night more projection was sometimes required. Particularly memorable are Helen Taylor's enigmatic Maggie, and Joe Kenneway's defensive and humourless Robert - he was known as Red Robbo at university, but now he drives a 4 x 4 and runs a chain of clothing shops. Cue swipes about his employment of Far Eastern sweatshop labour. But there's good work too, from Colin Macnee, Barbara Neville, Cathy Oakes, Steve Wright, and Louise Jones. Aside from sex and drugs, what else concerned these couples in their university days? The War (Vietnam) and the American President (Nixon), says playwright Coleman. And that's the really sobering thought that you take away from this play.
What happens when a group of old university friends encounter each other
again in mysterious circumstances after thirty years? As you might expect,
old passions resurface, secrets are outed and they remember why they
had organised a reunion before. Perhaps not the most original premise,
but Mike Coleman's new work deals well with complex issues about memory
and identity, spoiled only by a Priestley-esque descent into melodrama and
supernatural intervention. This entertaining ensemble piece from an
accomplished cast has some great one-liners and is worth seeing for its
intriguing middle section alone. Ultimately, however, more could have been
made of the play central preoccupations had a different course been
pursued.
Truth or Dare is set over the course of one evening, during which five old
university friends (along with the daughter of one) arrive at an old
cottage, having received an invitation and unaware that the others would
be there. The set is a simple representation of a living/dining room but
achieves the rare distinction of using the O'Reilly space well. The
theatre has a very large stage proportionate to its size as a venue and
productions generally struggle to fill it adequately. The Oxford Theatre
Guild also manages to create a realistic and inviting living space by
avoiding a problem that persistently dogs student productions: that of
appropriating college furniture to supply a production props.
Use of the balcony for an alternative bedroom set is effective as we feel
that we are getting a slightly sordid glimpse into private affairs. Tony
and Robert, once inseparable, have grown into the antitheses of each
other. Robert sees Tony as the eternal student who needs to move on; Tony
struggles to come to terms with the ultimate sell-out of his idol. On the
surface, Ruth and Nikki play the dutiful wives, but it soon becomes
apparent that all are to one degree or another unhappy and frustrated, as
jokes about cheap lager, unwashed plates and copious amounts of sex and
drugs give way to insults and the dredging up of unwanted memories. Stand
out perfomances include that of Steve (Steve Wright) as the aging Lothario
whose acute perception still succumbs to the temptation of denial and
self-justification, and Cathy Oakes as the shrill alcoholic ‘beamer
beaver (one can help but be reminded of Ange in Abigail's Party, a
similar drinks party from hell). However, the cast fail to sustain
momentum at moments of crisis and this partly contributes to the
unsatisfactory denouement.
The production is at its best during the dinner scene where traditional
table etiquette is ignored and sex, politics and religion are the staples
of an increasingly drunken conversation. Their reminiscences about their
student days are some of the funniest dialogue in the play (although
delivery was occasionally disturbed by the odd first-night fluffed line),
while their cliched glorification of the swinging sixties is thrown into
relief by the voice of the post-hippy generation, Jade.
Through her eyes we see the artificiality of their memories as she shoots
down their idealised truisms about the past; after listening to them
discourse on Lennon 'Imagine' and its symbolism of an optimism and hope
peculiar to their generation, Jade,s laconic observation that the song was
a hit from the seventies raises a laugh but forces them and us to admit
that they have collective false memory syndrome. Robert's awkward
mention of the old joke 'if you can remember the sixties then you weren't
there' puts the play's position squarely; it is an examination of our
re-imaginings of the past, and the way we use the past as a tool for
self-justification in the present.
In the play's last scene, after the recriminations and drunken honesty of
the dinner, the role of the Maggie, the mysterious housekeeper, is
revealed and the play tackles the wider theme of responsibility and
consequence. Maggie has brought them together to confront them with their
sexual and force them to realise the significance of the actions they
lightly dismissed under the blanket of free love. This is the plays real
weakness; it cannot resist spelling out its messages for us. With Jade
playing devil's advocate and the over-consumption of Liebfraumilch leading
to hasty words, the reunited friends soon show us their true colours. In
due course, the characters hypocrisy and ignorant selves emerge
organically from their dinner table discussions, which are very well
structured. By contrast with the dramatic subtlety of this scene, the
eventual catalogue of sexual misdemeanours and bed-hopping seems like
overkill.
The tight structure and unobtrusively realistic dialogue keep it highly
watchable throughout and it provides thought provoking insight into our
manipulation of our own (collective and individual) pasts to justify our
present. Comparisons with Priestly's An Inspector Calls are perhaps
inevitable but, that aside, this is a play that demands attention.
Theatre Review.
Cast in Order of Appearance
Maggie - Helen Taylor
Tony - Colin Macnee
Ruth - Barbara Neville
Robert - Joe Kenneway
Nikki - Cathy Oakes
Steve - Steve Wgight
Jade - Louise Jones
Production Team
Director - Aldyth Thompson
Production Manager - Zoe Robson
Lighting - Matt Boult & David Long
Sound - Harry Nixon
Props and Set - Raymond Dennehey
Costumes - Helen Wilcox
Front of House Manager - Kevin Elliot
Publicity Design & Photography - Mark Brome - www.markbrome.com
Other members of the crew:
Rainbow Calvert, James Norris Keiller, Stephen Ashworth, the front of House team.
With thanks To:
Bill Moulford, Felicity Peacock,
| What is the Guild | Bursaries | Recent Productions | Workshop On Theatre | Contact Us | History | Web Links | Guild News | | Home | Current Production |
|
Webmaster Stephen Whitaker |